Thursday, April 28, 2016

Tulipmania - Anne Goldgar (University of Chicago Press, 2008)


A serious review of one of the iconic financial bubbles in European history.  The author suggests that legend has largely shaped our views on its origin, extent, and impact on Dutch society.  [330.949203]

This book re-examines the Tulip bubble of 1636-7.  Its premise is that everything we all have read in Extraordinary Popular Delusions, in Burton Malkiel, and elsewhere is based on flawed documents.  All of these derive from a single 18th century source (or from MacKay who used this same source) that drew its information from 17th century pamphlets.  The pamphlets were written with didactic or moralizing intent rather than as actual history.  They exaggerated the spread of the speculation in society and its economic impacts of the Dutch economy. 

The book asserts that the Tulipmania we all know never really happened.  There was a rise in prices, but the trade was confined to a fairly small community of traders with a high concentration within the Mennonite religious sect.  The records indicate few bankruptcies resulting from the collapse in prices.   The plague in Holland in 1636 led to inherited wealth and a new attitude toward earthly pleasure also encouraged the bubble. 

One interesting financial aspect to the actual trade is that for seven months of the year, the bulbs stay in the ground.  The trade depended heavily on forward markets and prices.  That is why the collapse led to some problems of honor among the merchants - with a forward contract the temptation to renege is high when prices fall.  There is also the problem we saw in the repo fails situation in 2008 when contracts are daisy-chained; one failure to deliver disrupts an entire series of trades. 


The book can be a bit of a long read.  Goldgar, the author, is fairly detailed on the development of tulips as objects of beauty, for the newly prosperous merchant class of Holland in the Golden Age.  She goes then into the society that engaged in the tulip trade and how small this group was and how disputes were settled.  Finally the book begins to address the tulip market.  The main point is that the pamphlets that misled later readers reflected uncertainty about the new social mobility, the rise of new classes and the impact on traditional notions such as value and honor made all the more severe by the stress of dishonored contracts. 


In the end, however, such revisionist history is satisfying.  The book's subtitle "Money, Honor, and Knowledge in the Dutch Golden Age" explains the breadth of the argument.  It makes more sense of what is usually cited as simply the madness of crowds.

This book is recommended and highly recommended for readers with an interest in art history and Dutch culture.

Friday, April 22, 2016

End the Fed - Ron Paul (Grand Central Pub., 2009)

A rant by an author who does not accept the basics of banking and uses selective history to advance an argument of pure Austrian school theory.  [332.110973]  

This short book takes only a few hours to read.  To do so, however, is to waste those few hours.  If you know something about banking, money, macroeconomics, or the Federal budget process, you will not learn anything from this book.  If you do not know these things, you will not learn them here.  The more disturbing fact is that the author was the chair of the House Subcommittee on Monetary Policy and Technology.  

The book presents no logically constructed model or argument as to why the economy would be more stable without the Fed.  He generally ignores historic periods when the U.S. did not have a central bank.  His only argument is that prices have gone up since 1913 - a post hoc, ergo propter hoc argument blind to price movements before then.  He has a fascination with the Exchange Stabilization Fund, a $20 billion Treasury fund (small by the standards of the U.S. economy - the Treasury often borrows 3 to 4 times that amount in Treasury bills each week) that he suspects is being used to manipulate global markets.  A lot of the book is a string of hypotheses and conspiracies.  He opposes the use of fractional reserve banking; a concept that dates to the Renaissance. 

The book seems to be quite popular, but I have no idea why.  To read this book is to feel trapped at a family Thanksgiving dinner at which your great uncle, who has recently discovered the internet, holds forth for hours on things he has learned online.  There are too many "it could be that ..." types of assertions.  This book is for true believers who have no need of reason or facts.

This book is not recommended at any level.

Thursday, April 21, 2016

Making Sense of the Dollar - Marc Chandler (Bloomberg Press, 2009)

The Chief Foreign Exchange Strategist at Brown Brothers Harriman takes a critical look at ten myths about the balance of trade, the labor market, and globalization and the dollar. [332.4560973]

Marc Chandler takes the reader through a critical review of ten myths about exchange rates, the dollar, and international trade in a well-written 200 pages.  The book might have been suitably named, "Against the New Mercantilism."  The author completely takes apart the commonly held picture of a world in which the U.S. runs huge trade deficits that lead to an accumulation of dollars overseas that will weaken the U.S. standing in the world and that its manufacturing can be saved only by a weak dollar policy.  In every point, Chandler presents a fresh perspective to show how the common view is wrong.  

His first key point is that trade statistics do not capture how American firms compete in global trade.  Rather than producing everything in the US and shipping finished goods, US firms establish foreign subsidiaries to produce locally.  Much of what is measured in trade statistics is actually intra-firm movements of goods in production.  This means that trade data understate US competitiveness.  His second point is that dollars overseas serve more functions than simply being used to purchase goods made in the US.  This strikes at the commonly held notions of the proper exchange rate or the role of the dollar in the world economy.  Finally, he addresses the impact of institutions on the development of markets in modern societies.  This includes an insightful look at the myth that there is only one way to capitalism. 

The book is a fresh and much-needed antidote to the facile assertions about the US economy and its future in global trade.

This book is highly recommended.



And the Money Kept Rolling In (and Out) - Paul Blustein (PublicAffairs, 2005)

A history of the collapse of the Argentinian economy during its currency crisis of 2001.  The question is how could a country that seemed to live by the Washington consensus and was the darling of investment banks suddenly fall so far and so fast?   [330.98207]

Over the course of ten years, Argentina went from being the darling among emerging markets to a shattered economy.  The author suggests that much of the damage may have been self-inflicted, but that it was greatly helped along this path by policy decisions and interference by the IMF, the US Treasury, and the financial markets and banks.  These policies helped keep Argentina on an unsustainable path for too long before switching to a wrenchingly painful policy about face.

Argentina came out of the ruinous inflation of the late-1980s by adopting a rigid convertibility scheme of 1 U.S. dollar per 1 Argentine peso and committing to maintain that convertibility.  (In some ways, this action might be likened to going on a gold standard.)  The selection of the dollar for convertibility was odd because there was little tie between the two economies; that would mean that Argentina had fewer means of acquiring dollars as foreign reserves.  In the early 1990s, the economy took off with 10% annual growth and low inflation.  It cannot be said, however, that these were the necessary result of convertibility.  Worse, Argentina did little to change its fiscal policies; it ran deficits of significant size.  Because it was issuing so much debt, its weight in international indices for investment grew (a perverse aspect of indices such as EMBI) and that attracted foreign funds, sometimes justified on the grounds that the very marketability of so much debt was itself a sign of economic strength.

The crises of the mid-90s, in Mexico, Thailand, South Korea, and, worst of all, Russia, shook financial markets.  At this point, the IMF began to prepare for the end of peso convertibility, but Argentina would not budge.  The denouement comes to IMF loans trying to save the situation, the U.S. Treasury changing course to a tougher position, the flight of foreign capital, the uneven adoption of austerity that only slowed economic growth so as to make Argentina's debt burden more unsustainable, and the sudden withdrawal of IMF support.  The financial system collapsed as convertibility was only then ended. 

In sum, unwise policies were held onto for too long.  The global financial forces were too accommodating of the situation and abetted the maintenance of policies such as convertibility and fiscal looseness for longer than was wise.  When the international accommodation ceased, it came at the worst time and too swiftly.  The result was the sufferings of millions.

This book is recommended for its readability and the relevance to other bubbles.



Thursday, April 7, 2016

A Short History of Financial Euphoria - John Kenneth Galbraith (Penguin Books, 1994)

A look at three hundred and fifty years of speculative bubbles and the common characteristics of the major events.  The same dynamic, the same belief in something new appears in surprisingly short cycles.  "The world of finance hails the invention of the wheel over and over again, often in a slightly more unstable version."  [332.645]

This very slim volume (113 pages) is written with Galbraith's wit and sharp insight.  During speculative periods one may note the belief that either some new asset has arisen which can be expected to rise in price for an extended time or that others may be fooled, but it will be possible for the shrewd individual to know when to get off the ride, and that doubters are to be condemned.  Common to the rise of bubbles are the shortness of financial memory (previous episodes are forgotten) and the specious association of money with financial genius.  Unfortunately, the financial innovation that arises is usually some variation on leverage which works wonderfully in rising markets and extracts a terrible price in falling ones.  Those enjoying the benefits of leverage are hailed as financial geniuses.  When the crash comes, something other than greed or stupidity is blamed.  In the past, crashes have been blamed on program trading systems, or government reports, or small changes in GDP.  Certainly, the market cannot be at fault because that would violate the central tenet of the faith in the perfect market.  The last crisis covered is the 1987 savings and loan fiasco and the market collapse.  What gives credit to Galbraith's analysis of the common factors in crashes is that the reader can see the same factors and reactions in the dot com bust and in the great collapse of 2008.   

The author then follows major speculative bubbles from the Tulip mania (a review of another, better work on this will appear here eventually) and the South Sea Bubble through the 1929 crash and the 1987 Meltdown.  Because he is trying to cover 350 years in so few pages, the descriptions are useful only as a reminder of other works one might read of these events.  That becomes the weakest part of the book.  The book's real value lies in the common threads it finds.

This book is recommended with the caution noted above.